Over at RealClearPolitics, Austin Bay is speculating on some extreme consequences of the current Canadienne Scandal du jour, AdScam. (I wonder what the Quebecquois are calling it?)
A political specter haunts North America -- the specter of the world's next failed state.
We can still call it Canada, at least for a couple years. ...Say Quebec does become a separate European-style nation-state -- a "people" with cultural, linguistic, religious and historical identity (never mind the objections of Mohawk and Cree Indians living in Quebec). Quebec has the people and resources to make a go of it, though the economic price for its egotism will be stiff. British Columbia also has "nation-state" assets: Access to the sea, strong industrial base, raw materials and an educated population.
Oil-producing Alberta might join the United States and instantly find common political ground with Alaska, Louisiana, Texas and Oklahoma. Canada's struggling Atlantic provinces might find statehood economically attractive and extend the New England coastline. A rump Canada consisting of "Greater Ontario" -- with remaining provinces as appendages -- might keep the maple-leaf flag aloft. As for poor, isolated Newfoundland: Would Great Britain like to reacquire a North American colony?
I had to freshen up on my Canadian provinces geography, because it seemed to me Mr. Bay was leaving a few provinces out. Sure enough. What about:
- Saskatchawan?
- North West Territory?
- Yukon Territory?
- New Brunswick?
- Prince Edward Island?
- Nova Scotia?
- Manitoba?
If we let them into the Union as states, that would up it to 58 states, counting Alberta. It would be fun, to be sure, but could we teach those folks to tip 15%? I think not.
Oh, I forgot the Nunavut Territory. WTF? I never heard of it before, and I'm a guy who owns the yellow (geography) questions at Trivial Pursuits.
I say we bring in Newfoundland, England, Wales, and Scotland too, and be done with it.
Vive l'Anglais!