This is a plug-in hybrid diesel car.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
They're both a heck of a lot better for the environment and for our foreign policy than our current addiction to fossil fuels. The plug-in diesel hybrid is a big step forward from the current crop of hybrids, not least because of different batteries that are not an environmentalists worst nightmare (don't get me started). The Speculist turned me on the the plug-in, which is also a pretty good idea.
But plug-in hybrids would be revolutionary. The off-the-grid electrical equivalent of a gallon of gasoline costs about 75 cents. And if the reported all-electric range of 60 miles with an experimental plug-in Prius could be achieved in a production vehicle, most people would essentially burn no liquid fuel in their daily commutes.
The hybrid technology that's been developed for the Toyota Prius and other nonplug-in hybrids has needed further refinement to give us a production-ready plug-in hybrid. Last month Lithium Technology Corporation demonstrated a converted Prius that addresses many of these problems...
By switching to plug-in hybrids we could reduce oil imports by 52%. Domestic electricity could power most of our daily commuting. Longer drives, or high-speed commutes would kick in the internal combustion engine...
For those who would argue that electric vehicles just move pollution to the power plants, studies have shown that even on a coal grid, pollution is reduced more than 60% over burning fossil fuels within the car...
60% cleaner air on a coal grid? I'd take that. 75% cheaper fuel? Sounds good to me.
Speculist goes from there to the obvious recommendation to go nuclear (and being the Speculist, he goes from fission on to fusion!). I like the compressed air car idea better, but wouldn't it be cool to have two different amazingly clean gasoline alternatives duking it out in the free market to see which idea wins? And as long as gas mostly went away, who cares which one, or some other I don't know about yet, or an eclectic mix of three or more? Think the Chevy vs. Ford vs. Dodge vs. Japanese pickup rivalries are strong? They'd be nothing compared to this.
I'm 46 years old, and I've been reading stuff like this since I was 11 and first took a subscription to Popular Science. These both feel like real technology to me, not pie-in-the-sky, not cool-but-it'll-never-happen. Those Iranian and Saudi sh*t heads are going to wake up one morning real surprised to find no one asking them for oil and their checkbooks empty.
Amen!
Posted by: RightOnTheMoney | June 05, 2007 at 10:03 AM
I believe the quote says that it is $0.75 per gallon off the grid, not that the gird is 75% of the cost of gasoline. In other words, at $4.00 a gallon soon for the price of petrol, this represents about 19% the cost to get energy from the grid over the pump.
Posted by: An environmentalist | March 21, 2008 at 07:45 AM
You have a unique perspective. I admire you
Posted by: Griffeys Shoes | May 06, 2011 at 05:34 AM
Your composition is very good, hope to have the opportunity to read more of your article.
Posted by: Loubouin Shoes | May 17, 2011 at 05:11 AM